California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Dawkins, B245611 (Cal. App. 2014):
Appellant contends he is entitled to a reversal of the judgment as the audio recording was improperly admitted into evidence and admitting the audio recording into evidence constitutes prejudicial error. (People v. Watson (1956) 46 Cal.2d 818, 836.)
We disagree.
Page 11
1. The relevant legal authority.
This court reviews claims regarding a trial court's ruling on the admissibility of evidence for an abuse of discretion. (People v. Goldsmith (2014) 59 Cal.4th 258, 266 (Goldsmith).)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.