California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Ramirez, B267516 (Cal. App. 2016):
16. In his reply brief, appellant argues for the first time that his counsel "was not prepared to cross-examine any witness." We need not address arguments raised for the first time in the reply brief. (City of Merced v. American Motorists Ins. Co. (2005) 126 Cal.App.4th 1316, 1328-1329; Reichardt v. Hoffman (1997) 52 Cal.App.4th 754, 764.) In any event, the record contradicts this assertion.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.