The following excerpt is from United States v. Saavedra, No. 15-2307-cv (2nd Cir. 2016):
August 2009 through October 2011, D.A. 1041a far longer period than that which the jury considered in awarding damages. See, e.g., SEC v. Rosenthal, 426 F. App'x 1, 2 (2d Cir. 2011) (approving district court's imposition of civil penalties after considering, inter alia, egregiousness of defendant's conduct, degree of defendant's scienter, and whether conduct was isolated or recurrent).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.