California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from In re Eddie M., 3 Cal.Rptr.3d 119, 31 Cal.4th 480, 73 P.3d 1115 (Cal. 2003):
[3 Cal.Rptr.3d 129]
Contrary to what petitioner claims, the plain meaning of the statute does not support his approach. (See People v. Birkett (1999) 21 Cal.4th 226, 231, 87 Cal. Rptr.2d 205, 980 P.2d 912 [plain meaning controls].) No literal reference to behaviorcriminal or noncriminalhas ever appeared in section 777(a)(2).[3 Cal.Rptr.3d 129]
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.