The following excerpt is from Expressions Hair Design v. Schneiderman, 808 F.3d 118 (2nd Cir. 2015):
The First Amendment overbreadth doctrine "permits a defendant to make a facial challenge to an overly broad statute restricting speech, even if he himself has engaged in speech that could be regulated under a more narrowly drawn statute." Alexander v. United States, 509 U.S. 544, 555, 113 S.Ct. 2766, 125 L.Ed.2d 441 (1993). This doctrine responds to the concern that "the threat of enforcement of an overbroad law may deter or chill constitutionally protected speechespecially
[808 F.3d 137]
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.