California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Petty, 37 Cal.App.4th 730, 44 Cal.Rptr.2d 34 (Cal. App. 1995):
It necessarily follows any limitation on the trial court's power to dismiss a prior felony conviction for purposes of section 667, subdivision (e)(1) must be found in subdivision (f)(2) of that statute. The majority opinion assumes subdivision (f)(2) permits the trial court to dismiss a prior conviction in the interests of justice only on motion of the prosecutor and not on the court's own motion. If this is the correct interpretation of subdivision (f)(2) then that provision is unconstitutional as a violation of the separation of powers clause of the California Constitution. (See discussion below.) However, "statutes are to be so construed, if their language permits, as to render them valid and constitutional rather than invalid and unconstitutional." (Erlich v. Municipal Court (1961) 55 Cal.2d 553, 558, 11 Cal.Rptr. 758, 360 P.2d 334.) I believe subdivision (f)(2) can be given a constitutional construction.
Page 41
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.