The following excerpt is from Singleton v. Eli Lilly, Co., CASE NO. 1:10-cv-02019-AWI-SKO (E.D. Cal. 2011):
There are three theories of recovery which may be available to a plaintiff in an action against a prescription drug manufacturer if the manufacturer fails to warn of side effects association with a prescription drug: negligence, strict liability in tort, and breach of implied warranty. In any of the theories relied upon, the liability of a drug manufacturer in an action for a failure to warn of side effects associated with a prescription drug requires the plaintiff to allege (and later in the litigation, to prove) that: (1) the manufacturer had a duty to warn medical professionals or, in some limited cases, the consumer, regarding the known side effects of the drug; (2) the standard of care the manufacturer was required to use in fulfilling its duty to warn; (3) breach of the manufacturer's duty to warn by providing an inadequate warning; (4) injury suffered by the plaintiff is attributable to the manufacturer's failure to provide an adequate warning; and (5) the manufacturer's failure to warn was the proximate cause of the plaintiff's injury. See generally Carlin v. Super. Ct., 13 Cal. 4th 1104 (1996)).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.