In those circumstances, as the court said, in Saunders v. Multi Builders Ltd.:[5] Where a party elects to treat a breach as discharging him from his obligations, the effect is to terminate the contract from the moment of election and no earlier. Its termination is not retrospective. It still exists so far as the past acts and defaults of the parties are concerned, and it forms the basis upon which the innocent party may recover damages for the breach. ...
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.