California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Levens, B250023 (Cal. App. 2015):
Evidence of intimate partner battering and its effects will often be relevant to show both imperfect and perfect self-defense. (People v. Humphrey, supra, 13 Cal.4th at pp. 1083-1087 [using the term "battered woman syndrome" to reflect then-current statutory phrasing].) "As violence increases over time, and threats gain credibility, a battered person might become sensitized and thus able reasonably to discern when danger is real and when it is not. '[An] expert's testimony might . . . enable the jury to find that the battered [woman] . . . is particularly able to predict accurately the likely extent of violence in any attack on her. That conclusion could significantly affect the jury's
Page 14
evaluation of the reasonableness of defendant's fear for her life.' [Citation.]" (Id. at p. 1086.)6
c. Analysis
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.