California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from The People v. Hoover, 77 Cal.App.4th 1020, 92 Cal.Rptr.2d 208 (Cal. App. 2000):
We agree that the procedures followed in this case were somewhat irregular, due in part to the prosecution's sudden discovery during trial of the newly enacted section 1109. It would certainly have been better if the trial court had explained to the jury that its preliminary limiting instruction was wrong and that the evidence of past conduct could be considered to show that defendant had a present disposition to commit domestic violence offenses. (CALJIC No. 2.50.02.) (People v. Falsetta, supra, 21 Cal.4th at pp. 922-924.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.