What is the effect of the trial court's comments that the court relied on evidence that negated self-defense?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from In re Trevor W. v. Trevor W., D058118, Super. Ct. No. J226391 (Cal. App. 2011):

However confusing the trial court's remarks might be, it is clear the court relied on evidence that negated self-defense in this case. The court was entitled to make the credibility determination it made in this case and to give that evidence the weight it deemed appropriate. (People v. Humphrey (1996) 13 Cal.4th 1073, 1088-1089.) The evidence in this record is sufficient to support the true finding.

Page 7

The judgment is affirmed.

Other Questions


What are the cumulative effect of the trial court's alleged omissions by trial counsel and alleged deficiencies in the evidentiary evidence? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, does the appellate court have power to substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
Does the trial court instruct the jury on the limited admissibility of statements relied on by Edinger, the expert who gave evidence at trial on the basis of an expert opinion? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of a restriction on comment by the trial court on comments by a defendant in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances of the crime scene evidence will be admitted during the penalty phase of a penalty trial, does the trial court error not to exclude the evidence? (California, United States of America)
How does the Court of Appeal review a trial court's ruling to admit evidence over defendant's objection based on evidence section 352? (California, United States of America)
Does a competent, unconflicted counsel who submitted on the evidence at the preliminary hearing, should have argued to the trial court that this evidence did not establish the lawful duty element beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.