The following excerpt is from Maiden v. Bunnell, 35 F.3d 477 (9th Cir. 1994):
Whatever the judge meant by his remark, the jury could have taken from it an impression of "advocacy or partisanship." See Eldred, 588 F.2d at 749. We must therefore consider whether that impression would have made the trial inherently unfair, or whether the judge's subsequent admonition sufficiently obviated the risk of such an impression of prejudice infecting the trial. See United States v. Sanchez-Lopez, 879 F.2d 541, 555 (9th Cir.1989).
Cases finding fatally prejudicial judicial bias have uniformly involved much more
Page 483
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.