The following excerpt is from Maltzman v. Friedman, 103 F.3d 139 (9th Cir. 1996):
At the outset, we address an issue, not raised by either party in the district court or on appeal: the district court's exercise of supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law indemnity claim. We review a district court's decision to retain jurisdiction over supplemental claims when the original federal claims are dismissed for abuse of discretion. Allen v. City of Los Angeles, 92 F.3d 842, 845 (9th Cir.1996).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.