California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Berryman, B265766 (Cal. App. 2017):
Defendant contends the cumulative prejudicial effect of the assigned errors necessitates reversal of the judgment. We disagree. The de minimis effect of a brief improper but nonprejudicial comment by the prosecutor was of no significance. (People v. Ward (2005) 36 Cal.4th 186, 216.)
Page 21
The judgment is affirmed.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.