California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Elias V. (In re Elias V.), 188 Cal.Rptr.3d 202, 237 Cal.App.4th 568 (Cal. App. 2015):
The issue of voluntariness presents a mixed question of law and fact that is nevertheless predominantly legal.... [Citation.] Hence [o]n appeal, the determination of a trial court as to the ultimate issue of voluntariness of a confession is reviewed independently.... [] The trial court's determinations concerning whether coercive police activity was present, whether certain conduct constituted a promise and, if so, whether it operated as an inducement, are apparently subject to independent review as well. [Citation.] However, the trial court's findings as to the circumstances surrounding the confessionincluding the characteristics of the accused and the details of the interrogation [citation]are clearly subject to review for substantial evidence.... ' [Citation.] (People v. Jones (1998) 17 Cal.4th 279, 296, 70 Cal.Rptr.2d 793, 949 P.2d 890.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.