What is the current state of the law on net worth of a plaintiff in a motor vehicle accident case?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Kelly v. Haag, 145 Cal.App.4th 910, 52 Cal.Rptr.3d 126 (Cal. App. 2006):

In Kenly v. Ukegawa (1993) 16 Cal. App.4th 49, 57, 19 Cal.Rptr.2d 771, this court held "that in most cases there must be evidence of the defendant's net worth to support the punitive damage award." We explained that in examining assets without examining liabilities, or without "evidence of the entire financial picture," there was a risk of "crippling or destroying the defendant." (Ibid.) We further noted we could surmise the defendants had millions in assets, but we could also assume their debts were equally high. "Without evidence of the actual total financial status of the defendants, it is impossible to say that any specific award of punitive damage is appropriate." (Id. at p. 58, 19 Cal.Rptr.2d 771.)

In Lara v. Cadag (1993) 13 Cal.App.4th 1061, 1065, footnote 3, 16 Cal.Rptr.2d 811, the court concluded that "`[n]et worth' is subject to easy manipulation and, in our view, it should not be the only permissible standard. Indeed, it is likely that blind adherence to any one standard could sometimes result in awards which neither deter nor punish or which deter or punish too much." The court there found that a consideration of income alone does not permit meaningful review and "something more is required." (Ibid.)

Other Questions


Can a plaintiff bring an action under the California Motor Vehicle Accident Prevention Act for damages arising out of a motor vehicle accident? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant is liable for a motor vehicle accident under the California Vehicle Accident Act or the California Motor Vehicle Act? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between a plaintiff and plaintiff in a motor vehicle accident case? (California, United States of America)
In a motor vehicle accident case, in what circumstances will a plaintiff be able to argue that the instruction on unavoidable accident is incorrect? (California, United States of America)
Does the phrase "as a result of" in a motor vehicle accident apply to a section of the Motor Vehicle Accident Act? (California, United States of America)
Does section 3110 of the Ontario Motor Vehicle Code of Civil Procedure (Motor Vehicle Accident and Accident Benefits Act) apply to a mechanic's lien claimant? (California, United States of America)
Is an employer's claim for reimbursement under section 3852 of the California Motor Vehicle Accident and Accident Compensation Act limited to recovery for damages proximately caused by the accident? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a defendant in a motor vehicle accident case to argue that the accident was not a crime? (California, United States of America)
In a motor vehicle accident case, how have the courts interpreted the standard factor (a)-(b) and (b) instruction in determining the severity of the accident? (California, United States of America)
What is the relevant case law on the sufficiency of evidence in a motor vehicle accident case? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.