What is the current state of the law on Miranda rights?

consider, much less adopt, inasmuch as it was unchallenged by the government on appeal. Nevertheless, undoubted public safety considerations plausibly account for the conduct of the police in a way that militates against finding that the first interview was a premeditated attempt to evade Miranda. See generally Capers, 627 F.3d at 481; id. at 49294 (Trager, J., dissenting); cf. United States v. HernandezHernandez, 384 F.3d 562, 566 (8th Cir.2004) (finding that the failure of the officer to read the defendant his rights does not seem to have been an intentional withholding that was part of a larger nefarious plot. (quoting Reinert v. Larkins, 379 F.3d 76, 91 (3d Cir.2004))).⁵