The following excerpt is from Henriquez-Rivas v. Holder, Agency No. A098-660-718, No. 09-71571 (9th Cir. 2013):
"If past persecution is established, a rebuttable presumption of a well-founded fear arises, 8 C.F.R. 208.13(b)(1), and the burden shifts to the government to demonstrate that there has been a fundamental change in circumstances such that the applicant no longer has a well-founded fear." Tawadrus v. Ashcroft, 364 F.3d 1099, 1103 (9th Cir. 2004) (internal quotation marks omitted).
The term "particular social group" is ambiguous. Donchev v. Mukasey, 553 F.3d 1206, 1215 (9th Cir. 2009).
Page 6
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.