California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Fein v. Permanente Medical Group, 211 Cal.Rptr. 368, 38 Cal.3d 137, 695 P.2d 665 (Cal. 1985):
Under the traditional collateral source rule, a jury, in calculating a plaintiff's damages in a tort action, does not take into consideration benefits--such as medical insurance or disability payments--which the plaintiff has received from sources other than the defendant--i.e., "collateral sources"--to cover losses resulting from the injury. (See, e.g., Helfend v. Southern Cal. Rapid Transit Dist. (1970) 2 Cal.3d 1, 84 Cal.Rptr. 173, 465 P.2d 61.) Section 3333.1 alters this rule in medical malpractice cases. 20 Under section 3333.1, subdivision (a), a medical malpractice defendant is permitted to introduce evidence of such collateral source benefits received by or payable to the plaintiff; when a defendant chooses to introduce such evidence, the plaintiff may introduce evidence of the amounts he has paid--in insurance premiums, for example--to secure the benefits.
Page 388
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.