California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Donovan, F078247 (Cal. App. 2020):
affirmatively demonstrate "that counsel had '"'no rational tactical purpose'"' for [the] ... omission." (People v. Mickel, supra, 2 Cal.5th at p. 198.) This conclusion forecloses defendant's claim on direct appeal. Moreover, although defendant acknowledges he bears the burden of demonstrating prejudice on appeal and he advances a bare claim of prejudice, he makes no showing that counsel's failure to object resulted in prejudice in this case. As such, defendant satisfies neither prong of the inquiry.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.