The following excerpt is from Fabricant v. Henry, 35 F.3d 570 (9th Cir. 1994):
"[T]he petitioner in a habeas proceeding has the burden of demonstrating that an erroneous instruction 'so infected the entire trial that the resulting conviction violates due process.' " Prantil v. California, 843 F.2d 314, 317 (9th Cir.) (quoting Darnell v. Swinney, 823 F.2d 299, 301 (9th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 1059 (1988)), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 861 (1988).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.