California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Rivera, D073929 (Cal. App. 2019):
In his filing, Rivera asserts that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at the preliminary hearing because his defense counsel failed to present his defenses that (1) Rivera acted in self-defense because the victim was intoxicated and had antagonized him; and (2) he suffers from a substance abuse issue, which should have mitigated his sentence. Appellate counsel has also identified as an issue that "might arguably support the appeal" (Anders, supra, 386 U.S. at p. 744) that "the trial court erred in denying appellant's request to replace his appointed counsel pursuant to People v. Marsden, supra, 2 Cal.3d 118." Competent counsel has represented Rivera on this appeal, and we have
Page 5
considered these issues and conclude they do not raise any reasonably arguable issue for reversal on appeal.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.