The following excerpt is from Franklins v. Maricopa County Medical Center, 978 F.2d 714 (9th Cir. 1992):
2 Even assuming that a warrantless search occurred, it was nonetheless constitutional. The "automobile exception" to the warrant requirement obviously recognizes that the inherent mobility of an automobile "creates circumstances of such exigency that, as a practical necessity, rigorous enforcement of the warrant requirement is impossible." California v. Carney, 471 U.S. 386, 391 (1985), citing, South Dakota v. Opperman, 428 U.S. 364, 367 (1976). See also Carney, 471 U.S. at 391-92. (citations omitted).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.