What is relevant evidence admissible under the abuse of discretion standard?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Davis, H041255 (Cal. App. 2016):
"[A]ll relevant evidence is admissible." ( 351.) " 'Relevant evidence' " is defined as evidence "having any tendency in reason to prove or disprove any disputed fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action." ( 210.) This court reviews the trial court's rulings on the admissibility of evidence under the abuse of discretion standard. (People v. Scott (2011) 52 Cal.4th 452, 491.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test of relevance, relevance and abuse of discretion in determining the admissibility of evidence at trial? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of discretion standard apply to a ruling by the appellate court on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of discretion standard apply to a ruling by the appellate court on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the abuse of the abuse standard for exclusion of evidence under section 1154 of the Evidence Code? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of discretion standard apply to any ruling by the appellate court on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of discretion standard apply to a ruling by the appellate court on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for abuse of discretion on relevance and the exclusion of evidence under the Evidence Code? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for abuse of discretion in the context of a trial court's ruling on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review in the context of hearsay or abuse of discretion on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of discretion standard apply to a ruling by the appellate court on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
