The following excerpt is from Linsangan v. Salamat (In re Salamat), Adv. No.: 2:19-ap-01416-ER, Case No.: 2:19-bk-17051-ER (Bankr. C.D. Cal. 2020):
An injury is "willful" when "a debtor harbors 'either subjective intent to harm, or a subjective belief that harm is substantially certain.' The injury must be deliberate or intentional, 'not merely a deliberate or intentional act that leads to injury.'" Id. at 463 (internal citations omitted). An injury is "malicious" if it "involves '(1) a wrongful act, (2) done intentionally, (3) which necessarily causes injury, and (4) is done without just cause or excuse.'" Carrillo v. Su (In re Su), 290 F.3d 1140, 1146-47 (9th Cir. 2002) (internal citations omitted).
Page 11
In addition, the injury-producing conduct must be tortious in order to be excepted from discharge under 523(a)(6). Lockerby v. Sierra, 535 F.3d 1038, 1040 (9th Cir. 2008). "[C]onduct is not tortious under 523(a)(6) simply because injury is intended or 'substantially likely to occur,' but rather is only tortious if it constitutes a tort under state law." Id. at 1041.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.