California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Dick v. Beall, G043803 (Cal. App. 2011):
"Generally, where one party to a transaction has sole knowledge or access to material facts and knows that such facts are not known or reasonably discoverable by the other party, then a duty to disclose exists. [Citation.] In the context of a real estate transaction, [i]t is now settled in California that where the seller knows of facts materially affecting the value or desirability of the property . . . and also knows that such facts are not known to, or within the reach of the diligent attention and observation of the buyer, the seller is under a duty to disclose them to the buyer. [Citations.]' Undisclosed facts are material if they would have a significant and measurable effect on market value." (Shapiro v. Sutherland (1998) 64 Cal.App.4th 1534, 1544 (Shapiro).)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.