What is a reasonable probability that would have changed the outcome of a personal injury case?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Andrus, B249672 (Cal. App. 2014):
result of the proceeding would have been different. A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome." (Strickland v. Washington, supra, at p. 694.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is there any case law or case law that would have changed the outcome of a personal injury proceeding? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a plaintiff to bring a personal injury action under a statutory change in the law governing personal injury actions? (California, United States of America)
What is the "reasonable person" standard in determining whether a person is a reasonable person? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law or case law that would have changed the disposition of a defendant in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law or case law that would change the disposition of a defendant in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
In a personal injury case, can a plaintiff hire an attorney to prosecute the personal injury suit? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law or case law that would have changed the disposition of a defendant in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
What are some examples of high-profile personal injury cases involving personal injury? (California, United States of America)
How have the courts dealt with a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
