California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Gordon, D073435 (Cal. App. 2019):
Under section 1170, subdivision (b), " '[w]hen a judgment of imprisonment is to be imposed and the statute specifies three possible terms, the choice of the appropriate term shall rest within the sound discretion of the court.' " (People v. Jones (2009) 178 Cal.App.4th 853, 862.) A trial court has the discretion "to select among the lower, middle, and upper terms specified by statute without stating ultimate facts deemed to be aggravating or mitigating under the circumstances and without weighing aggravating and mitigating circumstances. [Citations.] Rather, 'a trial court is free to base an upper term sentence upon any aggravating circumstance that the court deems significant, subject to specific prohibitions.' " (Id. at p. 866.) "In determining the appropriate term, the court may consider the record in the case, the probation officer's report, other reports . . . , and statements in aggravation or mitigation submitted by the prosecution, the defendant, or the victim, or the family of the victim if the victim is deceased, and any further evidence introduced at the sentencing hearing. The court shall select the term which, in the court's discretion, best serves the interests of justice. The court shall set forth on the record the reasons for imposing the term . . . ." ( 1170, subd. (b).)
Page 10
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.