What evidence would have been considered prima facie admissible for impeachment purposes?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Holder, 165 Cal.App.3d 998, 212 Cal.Rptr. 198 (Cal. App. 1985):
1 Under the recent decision in People v. Castro (1985) 38 Cal.3d 301, 211 Cal.Rptr. 719, 696 P.2d 111, the Ohio conviction would have been prima facie admissible for impeachment purposes, subject to discretionary exclusion under Evidence Code section 352.
2 Corporations Code section 25401 provides:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is there a reasonable probability that the defense would have disclosed impeached impeached or impeached evidence to the defense? (California, United States of America)
Can a juvenile court exclude evidence that would have been admissible under section 352 of the Evidence Code? (California, United States of America)
Does evidence of gang activity have to be considered for the purpose of determining whether an individual acted with intent, purpose and knowledge? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing that statements by a victim about the value of a stolen property constitute "prima facie evidence of value for purposes of restitution"? (California, United States of America)
Is a motion to impeach an impeached member of the House of Representatives admissible as evidence? (California, United States of America)
If defense counsel objected to evidence regarding the hierarchy of a criminal gang in the context of the kanpol tattoo, would he have forfeited his contention that such evidence would be inadmissible? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances have the courts permitted the admission of statements from a defendant to police as evidence for impeachment purposes? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances have the courts permitted the admission of statements from a defendant to police as evidence for impeachment purposes? (California, United States of America)
Is there a need for a sua sponte instruction on the limited purposes for which evidence of prior crimes is admissible at the penalty phase of a capital case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for reviewing a pretrial ruling regarding the admissibility of impeachment evidence? (California, United States of America)
