Can a juvenile court exclude evidence that would have been admissible under section 352 of the Evidence Code?

Recognizing courts' wide discretion over the admission of evidence (People v. Lawley (2002) 27 Cal.4th 102, 155), appellant argues that the testimony the proposed witness would have given was relevant and admissible, and, with respect to the juvenile court's discretion to exclude evidence under Evidence Code section 352, that it would not have "necessitate[d] an undue consumption of time" or "create[d] substantial danger of undue prejudice" or "of confusing the issues." (Evid. Code, 352.)