California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from The People v. Ransome, B217992, No. NA080800 (Cal. App. 2010):
A prosecutor's misconduct violates due process if it infects a trial with unfairness. (People v. Harrison (2005) 35 Cal.4th 208, 242.) Less egregious conduct by a prosecutor
Page 8
may nonetheless constitute misconduct under state law if it involves the use of deceptive or reprehensible methods to attempt to persuade the court or jury. (Ibid.) "[W]hen the claim focuses upon comments made by the prosecutor before the jury, the question is whether there is a reasonable likelihood that the jury construed or applied any of the complained-of remarks in an objectionable fashion. [Citation.]" (People v. Samayoa (1997) 15 Cal.4th 795, 841.)
Absent a showing that an objection or request for admonition would have been futile or the harm could not have been cured, a defendant may not complain of prosecutorial misconduct unless the defendant objected to the alleged misconduct in a timely fashion at trial and requested that the jury be admonished to disregard the impropriety. (People v. Hill (1998) 17 Cal.4th 800, 820.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.