What are two "arguable issues" that the court will consider in its independent review?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Leal, G044520, G045845 (Cal. App. 2012):
To assist the court in conducting its independent review, and pursuant to Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738, counsel has suggested we consider two potentially arguable issues.
Page 5
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In what circumstances will the Court of Appeal consider an issue raised in a reply brief of an appellant before the reviewing court? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court have an independent duty to review the record for reasonably arguable issues? (California, United States of America)
Does a review court need to consider arguments not advanced in the trial, not in the opinion of the Review Court? (California, United States of America)
What issues have counsel considered to assist the court in its independent review? (California, United States of America)
On appeal, can the court conduct an independent review of the transcript of the in camera hearing and the records reviewed by the trial court to determine whether any records were improperly withheld? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for a receiver to review an order issued by the trial court? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing a lower court's ruling for abuse of power, does the court review the evidence or evaluate the credibility of witnesses? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General's assertion that appellate courts review probation conditions for abuse of abuse of power, if the issue was raised in the trial court? (California, United States of America)
How will the Court of Appeal review the judgment of the Superior Court of Justice in the absence of any review? (California, United States of America)
When a bench officer issued an order for a fee under review was not the same bench officer as the judge who presided over the trial, can the court exercise a less deferential standard of review? (California, United States of America)
