What are the implications of a court's rulings on the admission and exclusion of evidence for abuse of discretion?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Esperanza, E059110 (Cal. App. 2014):
"We review a trial court's rulings on the admission and exclusion of evidence for abuse of discretion. [Citation.]" (People v. Chism (2014) 58 Cal.4th 1266, 1291.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What are the implications of the Court of Appeal's ruling on the admissibility of evidence for abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
What are the implications of the Court of Appeal's ruling on the admissibility of evidence for abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
What are the implications of the Court of Appeal's ruling on the admissibility of evidence for abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
What are the implications of a court's ruling on the admissibility of relevant evidence for abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
What are the implications of the Court of Appeal's ruling on the admissibility of evidence for abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of discretion standard apply to a ruling by the appellate court on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of discretion standard apply to a ruling by the appellate court on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of discretion standard apply to a ruling by a trial court on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for abuse of discretion in the context of a trial court's ruling on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
Does the abuse of discretion standard apply to a ruling by the appellate court on the admissibility of evidence? (California, United States of America)
