California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Sanchez, S087569 (Cal. 2019):
"A number of factors may inform the court's inquiry as to whether the statement in question was made while the declarant was still under the stress and excitement of the startling event and before there was 'time to contrive and misrepresent.' [Citation.] Such factors include the passage of time between the startling event and the statement, whether the declarant blurted out the statement or made it in response to questioning, the declarant's emotional state and physical condition at the time of making the statement, and whether the content of the statement suggested an opportunity for reflection and fabrication. [Citations.] This court has observed, however, that these factors 'may be important, but solely as an indicator of the mental state of the declarant.' [Citation.] For this reason,
Page 33
no one factor or combination of factors is dispositive." (People v. Merriman (2014) 60 Cal.4th 1, 64.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.