California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Pladott v. Hammers, No. B215975, No. LC070878, No. LC081576 (Cal. App. 2010):
discretion (Sipple v. Foundation For Nat. Progress (1999) 71 Cal.App.4th 226, 247) and we find none. While appellants argue that they did not have adequate time for discovery, and suggest that their supplemental responses were necessary, they do not provide specifics, and thus do not adequately explain why they suffered prejudice as a result of these rulings.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.