How does the court approach a situation where a party to the action is unrepresented?

Manitoba, Canada


The following excerpt is from Cameron and Letkeman v. Cameron, 2015 MBQB 149 (CanLII):

In a recent Manitoba case involving unrepresented parties, Slipetz v. Trudeau, [2013] M.J. No. 159 (Man.QB), the court at para 8 described how a court should approach a situation where a party to the action is unrepresented. The paragraph is lengthy but the underlying principles may be summarized as being that self-represented litigants do not have “some kind of special status”; while the Rules of court cannot be ignored by them, the Rules are to be applied fairly as between both sides to the litigation.

Other Questions


Is a party entitled to party and party costs? (Manitoba, Canada)
Are party and party costs appropriate on Class III on a motion? (Manitoba, Canada)
In what circumstances will a party be bound by a third party's expectation of receiving something in return? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the test for establishing that a defendant is not a party to a cause of action? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the test for bringing an issue of public importance to the courts in a personal injury action? (Manitoba, Canada)
How should a court consider the promotion of diversity and multiculturalism when determining the reasonableness of an administrative action? (Manitoba, Canada)
How have courts dealt with the issue of delay in an action for delay? (Manitoba, Canada)
Is there any case law where an umpire considered information of one party without the knowledge of the other party? (Manitoba, Canada)
Does the Human Rights Appeal Court have concurrent jurisdiction with the Court of Appeal in a collective agreement dispute? (Manitoba, Canada)
Can a court order a security program be considered a governmental action? (Manitoba, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.