The steps in the unjust enrichment analysis concern first, whether the defendant has been enriched by the plaintiff and second, whether the plaintiff has suffered a corresponding deprivation. The third element of an unjust enrichment claim is that the benefit and corresponding detriment must have occurred without a juristic reason. (Kerr v. Baranow, 2011 SCC 10 at paras. 36 and 40)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.