Fulton J. found that "unfairly prejudicial" had a scope broader than that of "oppressive" and definitively included equitable considerations. [30] In Nystad v. Harcrest Apt. Ltd., supra, McEachern C.J.S.C. (as he then was) states at p. 47: Whereas the focus with regard to 'oppression' is on the character of the conduct complained of, it is apparent from the judgment of Lord Wilberforce that the focus with regard to the 'just and equitable' provision (in our Act 'unfairly prejudicial') is on the effect of the injured shareholder of the impugned conduct.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.