Under what strict scrutiny standard of review, is the state required to establish that it has a compelling interest?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Caruso, 161 Cal.App.3d 13, 207 Cal.Rptr. 221 (Cal. App. 1984):
Under the strict scrutiny standard of review, "the state must first establish that it has a compelling interest which justifies the law and then demonstrate that the distinctions drawn by the law are necessary to further that purpose." (People v. Olivas, supra, 17 Cal.3d at p. 251, 131 Cal.Rptr. 55, 551 P.2d 375, original emphasis.)
Page 225
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Does the state have a compelling state interest in protecting society from dangerous persons? (California, United States of America)
If a proper initial study has been conducted, does the standard of review shift to a de novo review of whether an EIR was required? (California, United States of America)
Is a child a compelling state interest that a state has not a duty to protect? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review and what is the state of the law on constitutional errors in evidentiary review? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing a new standard of review in determining whether a trust has been properly established? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing a section 654 challenge, what standard of review does the court apply in reviewing the challenge? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review for reviewing state law errors at the guilt phase of a trial? (California, United States of America)
Does the fact that a state law touches on the right to vote in a general election need to be reviewed in strict scrutiny? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a "compelling state interest" to restrict access to a person's fundamental human rights? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard of review of a trial court's ruling on a motion under section 995 of the Criminal Code seeking to establish the corpus delicti? (California, United States of America)
