In R v. D.D.T. (2004) ABPC 66, the issue concerned whether the police, in the midst of taking a statement from a youth, have an obligation to advise him or her of the presence of a parent at the police station such that the youth can decide whether or not to have that parent present. There, a parent had arrived and was demanding to see the youth, but the police refused to interrupt the statement that was underway. It was decided that the failure of the police to inform the youth of the parent's presence prior to the obtaining of a statement from him, and the failure to provide the youth with a reasonable opportunity to consult with the parent both breached s. 146 of the YCJA. Thus, the youth's waiver was found to be ineffective and his statement inadmissible.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.