In R v. D.R.B. [2004] B.C.P.C. 0144, an arrested youth attempted to contact counsel of choice but was unable to do so. The police knew this, but proceeded to take a statement. The court found that this did not give the youth a reasonable opportunity to contact other counsel and breached his Section 10(b) rights under the Charter. The continuing ambivalence of the youth as to whether or not he wished to give a statement or whether he wished to consult counsel prior to doing so, or have counsel present during the course of giving a statement, was found not to be sufficient to relieve the police of their obligation to ensure he had a reasonable opportunity to consult counsel.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.