This situation is analogous to Shirley v. Lockinger, 2004 SKQB 144, where the wife’s petition for division of property was struck because she failed to disclose that she was already divorced from the husband when she brought the petition. In paragraph 17 of her petition, the wife stated “none” in response to the pleadings regarding particulars and status of all legal proceedings instituted between the parties. The mother, in the case at bar, responded “none” to the pleadings in paragraph 18 that states the dates of written or oral separations or financial or custody agreements.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.