How have the courts interpreted the words “not resulting in death” in the context of medical malpractice cases?

Saskatchewan, Canada


The following excerpt is from Gukert v. Kuntz, 1970 CanLII 630 (SK CA):

A possible explanation for the use of the words “not resulting in death” is the one suggested by the editorial note [D.L.R.] to Jensen v. C.N.R., 1942 CanLII 163 (SK QB), [1942] 2 W.W.R. 368, 54 C.R.T.C. 394, [1942] 3 D.L.R. 694, namely, that it was “to preserve strictly” the rule in Baker v. Bolton et al. (1808), 1 Camp. 493, 170 E.R. 1033, where Lord Ellenborough told the jury: “In a civil Court, the death of a human being could not be complained of as an injury; ...”

Other Questions


How have the courts interpreted answers to the jury in a medical malpractice case? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the meaning of words in a libel case? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the findings of the trial judge in the context of sexual assault cases? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have courts interpreted language in the context of a husband's claim against his wife in a case where he was the manager of the property? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have courts and arbitrators treated sexual harassment in a medical malpractice case? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for negligence in the context of medical malpractice? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for gross negligence in a medical malpractice case? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have the words "gift" and "garnishment" in clause 3 of the Statement of Claimant's Notice of Claim to the Court of Appeal been interpreted? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for determining fault in a medical malpractice case? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted a surrender statement in the context of a commercial lease? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.