A possible explanation for the use of the words “not resulting in death” is the one suggested by the editorial note [D.L.R.] to Jensen v. C.N.R., 1942 CanLII 163 (SK QB), [1942] 2 W.W.R. 368, 54 C.R.T.C. 394, [1942] 3 D.L.R. 694, namely, that it was “to preserve strictly” the rule in Baker v. Bolton et al. (1808), 1 Camp. 493, 170 E.R. 1033, where Lord Ellenborough told the jury: “In a civil Court, the death of a human being could not be complained of as an injury; ...”
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.