How have courts interpreted language in the context of a husband's claim against his wife in a case where he was the manager of the property?
Saskatchewan, Canada
The following excerpt is from Pierce v. Thompson, 1921 CanLII 134 (SK CA):
In Karst v. Cook, Wetmore, C.J., after quoting the above language, says as follows: Now I agree with that; but I do not wish to be understood as holding that, it the husband carried on farming operations upon such land merely as his wife’s manager, it would deprive her of the right to her property or to the proceeds of that property.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
How have the courts interpreted the text of the Financial Conduct Code in the context of an executrix’s claim against a bank? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have courts interpreted oral contracts in the context of a servant's claim? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted the findings of the trial judge in the context of sexual assault cases? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
When a husband and wife are involved in a property transaction, can the husband be held liable for his debts? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have the courts interpreted a surrender statement in the context of a commercial lease? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How has the Rule of Civil Procedure been interpreted and interpreted in the context of a default judgment? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have courts interpreted the expression “null and void” in the context of null and void? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
In what circumstances will a landlord who claims to be a tenant be able to claim as landlord of a property where the landlord is not the landlord of the tenant? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
What is the test for claiming unjust enrichment in the context of a claim made by Alice against her former partner in her name? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
How have the words "gift" and "garnishment" in clause 3 of the Statement of Claimant's Notice of Claim to the Court of Appeal been interpreted? (Saskatchewan, Canada)
