What is the definition of “use” and what is the effect of the use when the use is limited to a 3.08 acre parcel?

Also in Gibbs v. Grand Bend (Village), supra at p. 656 Finlayson J.A. refers to the Black’s Law Dictionary, (6th ed.) definition of “use” as “that enjoyment of property which consists in its employment, occupation, exercise or practice.” The specific terms of the use as set forth in the deed of conveyance at issue here are spelled out in unambiguous language. The use is “free and uninterrupted” with the exception that buildings may not be constructed or placed on the lands. The use is for “all purposes” including the passage of vehicles and for the benefit of the corporate grantor (the appellant) and/or members of the “Pierlot family.” Finally, the use is also intended to be in conjunction with the appellant’s fee simple interest and that of members of the Pierlot family in the 3.08 acre parcel. In this respect, the terms of the reservation provide that the use will terminate when the fee simple in the 3.08 acres is conveyed by the appellant to a person other than a member of the Pierlot family.