The following excerpt is from Hills v. Canada (Attorney General), [1988] 1 SCR 513, 1988 CanLII 67 (SCC):
38. Wilson J., in the course of her reasons in Abrahams v. Attorney General of Canada, 1983 CanLII 17 (SCC), [1983] 1 S.C.R. 2, stated at p. 10: Since the overall purpose of the Act is to make benefits available to the unemployed, I would favour a liberal interpretation of the re‑entitlement provisions. I think any doubt arising from the difficulties of the language should be resolved in favour of the claimant.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.