The trust in that case had advanced capital to the husband and taken back a mortgage on the matrimonial home. Prowse J. determined that the capital of the trust, the mortgage, had been used for family purposes and, therefore, the husband’s contingent interest in the trust was a family asset (see also Todd v. Freeman, 2005 BCCA 519, 46 B.C.L.R. (4th) 207).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.