In our view, the trial judge properly exercised his discretion in considering information available at the date of trial to assess damages. While generally damages are assessed without reference to events occurring after the date of breach, exceptions have been recognized to arrive at a fair assessment of damages. See Laurentide Motels v. Beauport City, 1989 CanLII 81 (SCC), [1989] 1 S.C.R. 705 at 829. The trial judge gave cogent reasons for exercising his discretion to use available relevant information in the assessment of damages. We see no reason to interfere with that exercise of discretion. 6. Damages
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.