However, Rule 12(11) provides that even if a document has been substitutionally served in accordance with Rule 12(4), a person may show that the document did not come to his or her notice. As well, the test set out in Miracle Feeds v. D. & H. Enterprises Limited and Giesbrecht (supra), on which the defendants rely for their third argument, requires that they establish that they did not wilfully or deliberately fail to enter an appearance.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.