… I cannot see merit to the applications to vary. The test to vary an order of a single judge is narrow: a division of the court must be satisfied that the judge was wrong in law, wrong in principle, or misconceived the facts: Haldorson v. Coquitlam (City) 2000 BCCA 672. In the context of an order for security for costs, that may extend to consideration of problems not anticipated by the judge when established the terms for posting.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.